Testing GRBs as Standard Candles
S. Basilakos, L. Perivolaropoulos

TL;DR
This study evaluates the calibration of GRB correlations as standard candles for cosmology, testing for redshift evolution and model dependence, and finds one relation promising for constraining dark energy.
Contribution
It introduces a model-independent calibration method for GRB correlations and assesses their effectiveness in constraining cosmological parameters.
Findings
No significant redshift evolution detected in correlations.
The $E_{peak}-E_ ext{gamma}$ relation has lower intrinsic dispersion.
GRB correlations are less constraining than supernova data for $ ext{Om}_m$.
Abstract
Several correlations among Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) observables with available redshifts have been recently identified. Proper evaluation and calibration of these correlations may facilitate the use of GRBs as standard candles constraining the expansion history of the universe up to redshifts of . Here we use the 69 GRB dataset recently compiled by Schaefer (astro-ph/0612285) and we test the calibration of five of the above correlations (, , , , ) with respect to two potential sources of systematics: Evolution with redshift and cosmological model used in the calibration. In examining the model dependence we assume flat \lcdm and vary . Our approach avoids the circularity problem of previous studies since we do not fix to find the correlation parameters. Instead we simultaneously minimize with respect to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
