The origin of short-lived radionuclides and the astrophysical environment of solar system formation
Gounelle Meibom

TL;DR
This paper challenges the idea that short-lived radionuclides in the early solar system originated from a nearby supernova, arguing that stellar evolution timescales make such contamination unlikely.
Contribution
It demonstrates that supernovae are too slow to influence nearby protoplanetary disks within typical star formation timescales, providing a new perspective on radionuclide origins.
Findings
Supernovae occur too late to contaminate early protoplanetary disks in typical clusters.
Probability of disk contamination by supernova ejecta is approximately 0.3%.
Massive star evolution timescales exceed star formation timescales in embedded clusters.
Abstract
Based on early solar system abundances of short-lived radionuclides (SRs), such as Al (T Myr) and Fe (T Myr), it is often asserted that the Sun was born in a large stellar cluster, where a massive star contaminated the protoplanetary disk with freshly nucleosynthesized isotopes from its supernova (SN) explosion. To account for the inferred initial solar system abundances of short-lived radionuclides, this supernova had to be close ( 0.3 pc) to the young ( 1 Myr) protoplanetary disk. Here we show that massive star evolution timescales are too long, compared to typical timescales of star formation in embedded clusters, for them to explode as supernovae within the lifetimes of nearby disks. This is especially true in an Orion Nebular Cluster (ONC)-type of setting, where the most massive star will explode as a supernova 5…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
