Reply to Melott's Comment on ``Discreteness Effects in Lambda Cold Dark Matter Simulations: A Wavelet-Statistical View'' by Romeo et al
Alessandro B. Romeo, Oscar Agertz, Ben Moore, Joachim Stadel

TL;DR
This paper defends the original findings on discreteness effects in cosmological simulations against Melott's critique, clarifying misunderstandings and emphasizing the novelty of their analysis approach.
Contribution
The authors clarify their unique wavelet-statistical method and counter Melott's claim that their results are essentially the same as previous work.
Findings
Rebuttal of Melott's interpretation of their results
Clarification of the novel wavelet-statistical approach
Emphasis on the distinctiveness of their analysis method
Abstract
Melott has made pioneering studies of the effects of particle discreteness in N-body simulations, a fundamental point that needs careful thought and analysis since all such simulations suffer from numerical noise arising from the use of finite-mass particles. Melott (arXiv:0804.0589) claims that the conclusions of our paper (arXiv:0804.0294) are essentially equivalent to those of his earlier work. Melott is wrong: he has jumped onto one of our conclusions and interpreted that in his own way. Here we point out the whys and the wherefores.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena · Statistical and numerical algorithms
