The relative concentration of visible and dark matter in clusters of galaxies

TL;DR

This study analyzes the distribution of visible and dark matter in galaxy clusters A496 and Coma, finding dark matter is more concentrated than visible matter, with implications for understanding cluster mass composition.

Contribution

It provides a comparative analysis of dark and visible matter distributions in galaxy clusters using hydrostatic equilibrium models and X-ray data, considering different dark matter profiles.

Findings

Dark matter is more concentrated than visible matter in both clusters.

Galaxies contribute more to the mass budget than previously assumed.

Cannot determine the presence of a density cusp without additional small-scale data.

Abstract

[Abridged] We consider two clusters (A496 and Coma) that are representative of the two classes of cool-core and non-cool-core clusters. We first refer to a two-component dynamical model that ignores the contribution from the galaxy density distribution and study the condition of hydrostatic equilibrium for the hot intracluster medium (ICM) under the assumption of spherical symmetry, in the presence of dark matter. We model the ICM density distribution in terms of a standard $\beta$-model with $\beta=2/3$, i.e. with a distribution similar to that of a regular isothermal sphere (RIS), and fit the observed X-ray brightness profiles. With the explicit purpose of ignoring cosmological arguments, we na\"ively assume that dark matter, if present, has an analogous density distribution, with the freedom of two different density and length scales. The relative distribution of visible and dark matter is then derived by fitting the temperature data for the ICM under conditions of hydrostatic equilibrium. For both clusters, we find that dark matter is more concentrated with respect to visible matter. We then test whether the conclusion changes significantly when dark matter is taken to be distributed according to cosmologically favored density profiles and when the contribution of the mass contained in galaxies is taken into account. Although the qualitative conclusions remain unchanged, we find that the contribution of galaxies to the mass budget is more important than generally assumed. We also show that, without resorting to additional information on the small scale, it is not possible to tell whether a density cusp is present or absent in these systems. [Abridged]