Sustaining Educational Reforms in Introductory Physics
Steven J. Pollock, Noah D. Finkelstein

TL;DR
This study investigates how the implementation and faculty background influence the sustainability of research-based tutorials in introductory physics, highlighting factors that affect student learning gains across multiple courses and instructors.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on the factors affecting the sustained use of research-based tutorials and the impact of faculty background and curriculum choices on student learning.
Findings
Research-based tutorials lead to higher student gains.
Faculty involved in physics education research achieve better outcomes.
Use of Learning Assistants correlates with improved student performance.
Abstract
While it is well known which curricular practices can improve student performance on measures of conceptual understanding, the sustaining of these practices and the role of faculty members in implementing these practices are less well understood. We present a study of the hand-off of Tutorials in Introductory Physics from initial adopters to other instructors at the University of Colorado, including traditional faculty not involved in physics education research. The study examines the impact of implementation of Tutorials on student conceptual learning across eight first-semester, and seven second-semester courses, for fifteen faculty over twelve semesters, and includes roughly 4000 students. It is possible to demonstrate consistently high, and statistically indistinguishable, student learning gains for different faculty members; however, such results are not the norm, and appear to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
