Component separation methods for the Planck mission
S.M.Leach, J.-F.Cardoso, C.Baccigalupi, R.B.Barreiro, M.Betoule,, J.Bobin, A.Bonaldi, J.Delabrouille, G.de Zotti, C.Dickinson, H.K.Eriksen,, J.Gonz\'alez-Nuevo, F.K.Hansen, D.Herranz, M.LeJeune, M.L\'opez-Caniego,, E.Martinez-Gonz\'alez, M.Massardi, J.-B.Melin

TL;DR
This paper compares various component separation methods for the Planck mission, demonstrating their effectiveness in isolating the CMB from foreground emissions and detecting astrophysical signals.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive evaluation of multiple separation techniques using realistic simulations, highlighting the need for combined approaches for optimal results.
Findings
Effective removal of foreground contamination from CMB maps.
Accurate recovery of the CMB power spectrum up to the sixth acoustic peak.
Detection of approximately 2300 galaxy clusters via the thermal SZ effect.
Abstract
The Planck satellite will map the full sky at nine frequencies from 30 to 857 GHz. The CMB intensity and polarization that are its prime targets are contaminated by foreground emission. The goal of this paper is to compare proposed methods for separating CMB from foregrounds based on their different spectral and spatial characteristics, and to separate the foregrounds into components of different physical origin. A component separation challenge has been organized, based on a set of realistically complex simulations of sky emission. Several methods including those based on internal template subtraction, maximum entropy method, parametric method, spatial and harmonic cross correlation methods, and independent component analysis have been tested. Different methods proved to be effective in cleaning the CMB maps from foreground contamination, in reconstructing maps of diffuse Galactic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
