3--symmetric and 3--decomposable drawings of $K_n$ (extended version)
B. \'Abrego, M. Cetina, S. Fern\'andez--Merchant, J. Lea\~nos, and G., Salazar

TL;DR
This paper investigates the structure of crossing-minimal geometric drawings of complete graphs, focusing on 3-symmetry and 3-decomposability, and provides new bounds and constructions that improve existing crossing number estimates.
Contribution
It proves lower bounds for 3-decomposable drawings and constructs new 3-symmetric and 3-decomposable drawings that improve the upper bounds of the rectilinear crossing number of $K_n$.
Findings
Any 3-decomposable drawing has at least 0.380029 * binomial(n,4) crossings.
Constructed 3-symmetric and 3-decomposable drawings improve the upper bound to 0.380488 * binomial(n,4).
Explicit constructions for n<100 match or surpass previous best known drawings.
Abstract
Even the most superficial glance at the vast majority of crossing-minimal geometric drawings of reveals two hard-to-miss features. First, all such drawings appear to be 3-fold symmetric (or simply {\em 3-symmetric}) . And second, they all are {\em 3-decomposable}, that is, there is a triangle enclosing the drawing, and a balanced partition of the underlying set of points , such that the orthogonal projections of onto the sides of show between and on one side, between and on another side, and between and on the third side. In fact, we conjecture that all optimal drawings are 3-decomposable, and that there are 3-symmetric optimal constructions for all multiple of 3. In this paper, we show that any 3-decomposable geometric drawing of has at least crossings. On the other hand, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Digital Image Processing Techniques · Point processes and geometric inequalities
