Improving Coverage Accuracy of Block Bootstrap Confidence Intervals
Stephen M.S. Lee, P.Y. Lai

TL;DR
This paper introduces two novel methods to enhance the coverage accuracy of block bootstrap confidence intervals for dependent data, reducing the need for complex Studentization and improving practical applicability.
Contribution
It proposes two approaches—iterative calibration and direct Studentization—that achieve high-order accuracy with simple tuning, applicable under broad conditions.
Findings
Both methods improve coverage accuracy in simulations.
The approaches require only nested block bootstrap resampling.
Empirical results support theoretical high-order accuracy.
Abstract
The block bootstrap confidence interval based on dependent data can outperform the computationally more convenient normal approximation only with non-trivial Studentization which, in the case of complicated statistics, calls for highly specialist treatment. We propose two different approaches to improving the accuracy of the block bootstrap confidence interval under very general conditions. The first calibrates the coverage level by iterating the block bootstrap. The second calculates Studentizing factors directly from block bootstrap series and requires no non-trivial analytic treatment. Both approaches involve two nested levels of block bootstrap resampling and yield high-order accuracy with simple tuning of block lengths at the two resampling levels. A simulation study is reported to provide empirical support for our theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
