Structural Properties of Ultra-Compact Dwarf Galaxies in the Fornax and Virgo Clusters
E.A. Evstigneeva, M.J. Drinkwater, C.Y. Peng, M. Hilker, R. De, Propris, J.B. Jones, S. Phillipps, M.D. Gregg, A.M. Karick

TL;DR
This study analyzes the structural properties of 21 ultra-compact dwarf galaxies in the Virgo and Fornax Clusters to explore their origins, finding they share characteristics with both globular clusters and galaxy nuclei, challenging simple formation models.
Contribution
It provides detailed structural and color analysis of UCDs, testing their formation hypotheses and highlighting differences from galaxy nuclei, thus advancing understanding of UCD origins.
Findings
UCDs have extended outer halos not explained by standard King models.
Color gradients in luminous UCDs are positive, indicating redder outskirts.
UCDs are significantly larger than galaxy nuclei at similar luminosities.
Abstract
We present a detailed analysis of two-band HST/ACS imaging of 21 ultra-compact dwarf (UCD) galaxies in the Virgo and Fornax Clusters. The aim of this work is to test two formation hypotheses for UCDs--whether they are bright globular clusters (GCs) or "threshed'' early-type dwarf galaxies--by comparison of UCD structural parameters and colors with GCs and galaxy nuclei. We find that the UCD surface brightness profiles can be described by a range of models and that the luminous UCDs can not be described by standard King models with tidal cutoffs as they have extended outer halos. This is not expected from traditional King models of GCs, but is consistent with recent results for massive GCs. The total luminosities, colors and sizes of the UCDs are consistent with them being either luminous GCs or threshed nuclei of both early-type and late-type galaxies (not just early-type dwarfs). For…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
