The see-saw mechanism: neutrino mixing, leptogenesis and lepton flavor violation
Werner Rodejohann

TL;DR
This paper reviews the see-saw mechanism for neutrino mass generation, exploring its phenomenology, variants, and indirect tests like leptogenesis and lepton flavor violation, highlighting the challenges in reconstructing the mechanism from low-energy data.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of see-saw models, their variants, and phenomenological implications, including the dependence of lepton flavor violation on neutrino parameters and model specifics.
Findings
Lepton flavor violation depends on the dominant see-saw component.
Absence of certain decays implies CP conservation in neutrino oscillations.
Tau -> mu gamma has the largest branching ratio in specific models.
Abstract
The see-saw mechanism to generate small neutrino masses is reviewed. After summarizing our current knowledge about the low energy neutrino mass matrix we consider reconstructing the see-saw mechanism. Low energy neutrino physics is not sufficient to reconstruct see-saw, a feature which we refer to as ``see-saw degeneracy''. Indirect tests of see-saw are leptogenesis and lepton flavor violation in supersymmetric scenarios, which together with neutrino mass and mixing define the framework of see-saw phenomenology. Several examples are given, both phenomenological and GUT-related. Variants of the see-saw mechanism like the type II or triplet see-saw are also discussed. In particular, we compare many general aspects regarding the dependence of LFV on low energy neutrino parameters in the extreme cases of a dominating conventional see-saw term or a dominating triplet term. For instance, the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
