Number Density Evolution of Ks -band Selected High Redshift Galaxy Populations in the AKARI North Ecliptic Pole Field
Koji Imai, Chris P. Pearson, Hideo Matsuhara, Takehiko Wada, Shinki, Oyabu, Toshinobu Takagi, Naofumi Fujishiro, Hitoshi Hanami

TL;DR
This study analyzes the number density evolution of high-redshift galaxy populations selected in the Ks-band in the AKARI NEP field, comparing observations with evolutionary models to understand galaxy formation and evolution.
Contribution
It provides new observational counts of high-redshift galaxy populations and tests evolutionary models, highlighting the need for density evolution in passive galaxy counts.
Findings
Pure luminosity evolution models without density evolution fail at faint magnitudes.
Negative density evolution models fit the observed passive galaxy counts.
Dusty ERO counts can be explained by submillimetre galaxy contributions.
Abstract
We present the number counts of Ks-band selected high redshift galaxy populations such as extremely red objects (EROs), B, z & K -band selected galaxies (BzKs) and distant red galaxies (DRGs) in the AKARI NEP field. The final catalogue contains 308 EROs (Ks<19.0 ; 54 percent are dusty star-forming EROs and the rest are passive old EROs), 137 star-forming BzKs and 38 passive old BzKs (Ks<19.0) and 64 DRGs (Ks<18.6). We also produce individual component source counts for both the dusty star-forming and passive populations. We compare the observed number counts of the high redshift passively evolving galaxy population with a backward pure luminosity evolution (PLE) model allowing different degrees of number density evolution. We find that the PLE model without density evolution fails to explain the observed counts at faint magnitudes, while the model incorporating negative density…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
