Comment on "Large energy gaps in CaC6 from tunneling spectroscopy: possible evidence of strong-coupling superconductivity"
N. Emery, C. Herold, S. Cahen, H. Rida, J. F. Mareche, P. Lagrange, G., Lamura
TL;DR
This paper critically examines previous claims of large energy gaps in CaC6, questioning the evidence for strong-coupling superconductivity based on tunneling spectroscopy data.
Contribution
It provides a detailed critique of earlier experimental interpretations, highlighting potential flaws and alternative explanations for the observed data.
Findings
Questions the evidence for strong-coupling superconductivity in CaC6
Suggests alternative interpretations of tunneling spectroscopy results
Highlights the need for further experimental verification
Abstract
Comment on "Large energy gaps in CaC6 from tunneling spectroscopy: possible evidence of strong-coupling superconductivity"
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRare-earth and actinide compounds · Iron-based superconductors research · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials