Blandford's Argument: The Strongest Continuous Gravitational Wave Signal
B. Knispel, B. Allen

TL;DR
This paper revisits Blandford's argument on gravitational wave amplitudes from neutron stars, showing that realistic galaxy models invalidate key assumptions, leading to stronger upper limits on expected signals.
Contribution
The authors extend Blandford's argument within a general framework and demonstrate through simulations that realistic galaxy distributions affect expected gravitational wave amplitudes.
Findings
Key assumptions of Blandford's argument are generally not valid in realistic galaxy models.
The maximum expected gravitational-wave amplitude depends on deformation and rotation frequency.
Upper limits on gravitational-wave amplitude are strengthened by a factor of 6 for realistic ellipticities.
Abstract
For a uniform population of neutron stars whose spin-down is dominated by the emission of gravitational radiation, an old argument of Blandford states that the expected gravitational-wave amplitude of the nearest source is independent of the deformation and rotation frequency of the objects. Recent work has improved and extended this argument to set upper limits on the expected amplitude from neutron stars that also emit electromagnetic radiation. We restate these arguments in a more general framework, and simulate the evolution of such a population of stars in the gravitational potential of our galaxy. The simulations allow us to test the assumptions of Blandford's argument on a realistic model of our galaxy. We show that the two key assumptions of the argument (two dimensionality of the spatial distribution and a steady-state frequency distribution) are in general not fulfilled. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
