Rejoinder: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data
Joseph D. Y. Kang, Joseph L. Schafer

TL;DR
This paper discusses and compares different strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data, clarifying the concept of double robustness and evaluating its effectiveness.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of alternative methods for population mean estimation under data incompleteness, enhancing understanding of double robustness.
Findings
Double robust methods can provide consistent estimates if either the model for the outcome or the model for the missing data mechanism is correct.
Comparison reveals strengths and weaknesses of various strategies in different data scenarios.
Clarifies misconceptions about the robustness and applicability of double robust estimators.
Abstract
Rejoinder to ``Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data'' [arXiv:0804.2958]
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
