On Greedy Clique Decompositions and Set Representations of Graphs
Tao-Ming Wang, Jun-Lin Kuo

TL;DR
This paper explores greedy clique decompositions and their relation to set representations of graphs, establishing bounds on the number of cliques in such decompositions and their connection to set family representations.
Contribution
It extends McGuinness's result by analyzing greedy clique decompositions through the lens of set representations with distinct sets, confirming the same clique bound.
Findings
Greedy clique decompositions have at most cliques for n-vertex graphs.
A correspondence exists between certain set representations and clique partitions.
The bound applies to greedy methods using distinct set families.
Abstract
In 1994 S. McGuinness showed that any greedy clique decompo- sition of an n-vertex graph has at most cliques (The greedy clique decomposition of a graph, J. Graph Theory 18 (1994) 427-430), where a clique decomposition means a clique partition of the edge set and a greedy clique decomposition of a graph is obtained by removing maximal cliques from a graph one by one until the graph is empty. This result solved a conjecture by P. Winkler. A multifamily set rep- resentation of a simple graph G is a family of sets, not necessarily distinct, each member of which represents a vertex in G, and the in- tersection of two sets is non-empty if and only if two corresponding vertices in G are adjacent. It is well known that for a graph G, there is a one-to-one correspondence between multifamily set representations and clique coverings of the edge set. Further for a graph one…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
