Nonempirical Density Functionals Investigated for Jellium: Spin-Polarized Surfaces, Spherical Clusters, and Bulk Linear Response
Jianmin Tao, John P. Perdew, Luis Miguel Almeida, Carlos Fiolhais, and, Stephan K\"ummel

TL;DR
This paper evaluates various nonempirical density functionals, including TPSS and PBE, for modeling jellium systems, focusing on surface energies, work functions, magnetism, and linear response, and compares results with Quantum Monte Carlo data.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of nonempirical density functionals for jellium, highlighting their accuracy in surface properties, magnetism, and linear response, with new insights into their equivalence and limits.
Findings
TPSS matches PBE in surface correlation energy at normal densities
TPSS offers a consistent estimate for the low-density limit
All tested functionals accurately reproduce the linear response up to twice the Fermi wavevector
Abstract
Earlier tests show that the Tao-Perdew-Staroverov-Scuseria (TPSS) nonempirical meta-generalized gradient approximation (meta-GGA) for the exchange-correlation energy yields more accurate surface energies than the local spin density (LSD) approximation for spin-unpolarized jellium. In this study, work functions and surface energies of a jellium metal in the presence of ``internal'' and external magnetic fields are calculated with LSD, Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) GGA, and TPSS meta-GGA and its predecessor, the nearly nonempirical Perdew-Kurth-Zupan-Blaha (PKZB) meta-GGA, using self-consistent LSD orbitals and densities. The results show that: (i) For normal bulk densities, the surface correlation energy is the same in TPSS as in PBE, as it should be since TPSS strives to represent a self-correlation correction to PBE; (ii) Normal surface density profiles can be scaled uniformly to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
