Monads and comonads in module categories
Gabriella B\"ohm, Tomasz Brzezinski, Robert Wisbauer

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationships between monads and comonads in module categories, revealing new insights into algebraic structures like corings, bialgebras, and Hopf algebras through categorical analysis.
Contribution
It investigates categories of modules and comodules associated with Hom functors, providing new characterizations of corings, bialgebras, and Hopf algebras using categorical frameworks.
Findings
Categories of C-comodules and Hom_C-modules are equivalent if C is coseparable.
A bialgebra H is a Hopf algebra iff Hom_R(H,-) forms a Hopf bimonad.
Categories of H-Hopf modules and bimodules are equivalent to module categories.
Abstract
Let be a ring and the category of -modules. It is well known in module theory that for any -bimodule , is an -ring if and only if the functor is a monad (or triple). Similarly, an -bimodule is an -coring provided the functor is a comonad (or cotriple). The related categories of modules (or algebras) of and comodules (or coalgebras) of are well studied in the literature. On the other hand, the right adjoint endofunctors and are a comonad and a monad, respectively, but the corresponding (co)module categories did not find much attention so far. The category of -comodules is isomorphic to the category of -modules, while the category of -modules (called -contramodules by Eilenberg and Moore) need not be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
