Detailed Abundances for 28 Metal-poor Stars: Stellar Relics in the Milky Way
David K. Lai (1), Michael Bolte (1), Jennifer A. Johnson (2), Sara, Lucatello (3), Alexander Heger (1,4), and S.E. Woosley (1) ((1) UCSC, (2), OSU, (3) INAF-OPAD, (4) LANL)

TL;DR
This study analyzes detailed chemical abundances of 28 metal-poor stars in the Milky Way, revealing insights into early nucleosynthesis, neutron-capture processes, and supernova progenitors at extremely low metallicities.
Contribution
First detailed abundance measurements for 13 stars with [Fe/H] < -2.6, including nine with [Fe/H] < -3.0, and identification of a new r-process-enhanced star with actinide boost.
Findings
Most metal-poor star shows typical abundance pattern for its metallicity.
Detected neutron-capture activity at very low metallicities, mainly from the main r-process.
Supernova models with progenitors of 10-20 M☉ best match observed abundances.
Abstract
We present the results of an abundance analysis for a sample of stars with [Fe/H]. The data were obtained with the HIRES spectrograph at Keck Observatory. The set includes 28 stars, with effective temperature ranging from 4800 to 6600 K. For 13 stars with [Fe/H], including nine with [Fe/H] and one with [Fe/H], these are the first reported detailed abundances. For the most metal-poor star in our sample, CS 30336-049, we measure an abundance pattern that is very similar to stars in the range [Fe/H], including a normal C+N abundance. We also find that it has very low but measurable Sr and Ba, indicating some neutron-capture activity even at this low of a metallicity. We explore this issue further by examining other very neutron-capture-deficient stars, and find that at the lowest levels, [Ba/Sr] exhibits the ratio of the main r-process. We also…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
