Cross-sections for nuclide production in 56Fe target irradiated by 300, 500,750, 1000, 1500, and 2600 MeV protons compared with data on hydrogen target irradiation by 300, 500, 750, 1000, and 1500 MeV/nucleon 56Fe ions
Yu. E. Titarenko, V. F. Batyaev, A. Yu. Titarenko, M. A. Butko, K. V., Pavlov, S. N. Florya, R. S. Tikhonov, S. G. Mashnik, A. V. Ignatyuk, N. N., Titarenko, W. Gudowsky, M. Tesinsky, C.-M. L. Persson, H. Ait Abderrahim, H., Kumawat, H. Duarte

TL;DR
This study measured cross-sections for nuclide production in 56Fe targets irradiated by protons at various energies, comparing results with previous data and nuclear reaction models to identify discrepancies and areas for model improvement.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive set of experimental cross-section data for 56Fe(p,x) reactions across multiple energies, and evaluates the accuracy of 15 nuclear reaction codes against these measurements.
Findings
Most data agree with inverse kinematics results
Some earlier activation data are inconsistent with current measurements
Discrepancies observed in yields of light nuclei with A<30
Abstract
Cross-sections for radioactive nuclide production in 56Fe(p,x) reactions at 300, 500, 750, 1000, 1500, and 2600 MeV were measured using the ITEP U-10 proton accelerator. In total, 221 independent and cumulative yields of products of half-lives from 6.6 min to 312 days have been obtained via the direct-spectrometry method. The measured data have been compared with the experimental data obtained elsewhere by the direct and inverse kinematics methods and with calculations by 15 codes, namely: MCNPX (INCL, CEM2k, BERTINI, ISABEL), LAHET (BERTINI, ISABEL), CEM03 (.01, .G1, .S1), LAQGSM03 (.01, .G1, >.S1), CASCADE-2004, LAHETO, and BRIEFF. Most of our data are in a good agreement with the inverse kinematics results and disprove the results of some earlier activation measurements that were quite different from the inverse kinematics measurements. The most significant calculation-to-experiment…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
