The defining characteristics of Intermediate Polars - the case of three candidate systems
Gavin Ramsay (1), Peter J. Wheatley (2), A. J. Norton (3), Pasi Hakala, (4), Darren Baskill (5,6), ((1) Armagh Observatory, (2) University of, Warwick, (3) Open University, (4) Tuorla Observatory, (5) University of, Leicester, (6) Royal Observatory Greenwich)

TL;DR
This study investigates three candidate Intermediate Polars, confirming one as an IP and providing evidence that the others are likely IPs despite lacking clear spin period modulations, based on X-ray spectral analysis.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel analysis of XMM-Newton data for three CVs, confirming their classification as IPs and discussing implications for defining characteristics.
Findings
Confirmed ~760 sec spin period in EI UMa
Identified potential short-term peaks in other sources
All three sources have X-ray spectra similar to known IPs
Abstract
Intermediate Polars (IPs) are a group of cataclysmic variables (CVs) which are thought to contain white dwarfs which have a magnetic field strength in the range ~0.1-10MG. A significant fraction of the X-ray sources detected in recent deep surveys has been postulated to consist of IPs. Until now two of the defining characteristics of IPs have been the presence of high (and complex) absorption in their X-ray spectra and the presence of a stable modulation in the X-ray light curve which is a signature of the spin period, or the beat period, of the accreting white dwarf. Three CVs, V426 Oph, EI UMa and LS Peg, have characteristics which are similar to IPs. However, there has been only tentative evidence for a coherent period in their X-ray light curve. We present the results of a search for coherent periods in XMM-Newton data of these sources using an auto-regressive analysis which models…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
