Gamma-ray Bursts, Classified Physically
Joshua S. Bloom, Nathaniel R. Butler, Daniel A. Perley (UC Berkeley)

TL;DR
This paper discusses the growing diversity of gamma-ray burst sources and proposes a new, physically based classification scheme to better understand their underlying physics, complementing existing phenomenological classifications.
Contribution
It introduces a novel classification framework for gamma-ray bursts grounded in physical origins, addressing limitations of traditional phenomenological methods.
Findings
Traditional classifications are insufficient for diverse GRB sources
A new physical classification scheme is proposed
The scheme aims to improve understanding of GRB physics
Abstract
From Galactic binary sources, to extragalactic magnetized neutron stars, to long-duration GRBs without associated supernovae, the types of sources we now believe capable of producing bursts of gamma-rays continues to grow apace. With this emergent diversity comes the recognition that the traditional (and newly formulated) high-energy observables used for identifying sub-classes does not provide an adequate one-to-one mapping to progenitors. The popular classification of some > 100 sec duration GRBs as ``short bursts'' is not only an unpalatable retronym and syntactically oxymoronic but highlights the difficultly of using what was once a purely phenomenological classification to encode our understanding of the physics that gives rise to the events. Here we propose a physically based classification scheme designed to coexist with the phenomenological system already in place and argue for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
