Complements and signed digit representations: Analysis of a multi-exponentiation-algorithm of Wu, Lou, Lai and Chang
Clemens Heuberger, Helmut Prodinger

TL;DR
This paper critically re-evaluates a multi-exponentiation algorithm using signed digit representations, revealing that the original analysis was incorrect and that the complement operation is unnecessary for its performance.
Contribution
The paper corrects the analysis of Wu, Lou, Lai, and Chang's algorithm and shows that the complement step can be omitted without affecting efficiency.
Findings
Original analysis was incorrect
Complement operation has negligible impact on performance
Omitting the complement simplifies the algorithm
Abstract
Wu, Lou, Lai and Chang proposed a multi-exponentiation algorithm using binary complements and the non-adjacent form. The purpose of this paper is to show that neither the analysis of the algorithm given by its original proposers nor that by other authors are correct. In fact it turns out that the complement operation does not have significant influence on the performance of the algorithm and can therefore be omitted.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgorithms and Data Compression · Coding theory and cryptography · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
