Bell correlations and equal time measurements
Frederick H. Willeboordse

TL;DR
This paper discusses how certain measurement setups can mimic quantum correlations and argues that avoiding coincidence monitors is essential to exclude local hidden variables, highlighting a subtlety in testing Bell inequalities.
Contribution
It introduces simple binary apparatuses that replicate quantum correlations and emphasizes the importance of measurement methods in Bell tests.
Findings
Coincidence measurements can mimic quantum correlations.
Avoiding coincidence monitors is crucial to exclude local hidden variables.
Simple apparatuses can reproduce quantum predictions under certain measurement schemes.
Abstract
According to the Bell theorem, local hidden variable theories cannot reproduce all the predictions of quantum mechanics. An important consequence is that under physically reasonable assumptions quantum mechanics predicts correlations that seem impossible to obtain from a realistic system. In this paper, two simple binary apparatuses are discussed that can accurately mimic correlations predicted by quantum mechanics \textit{if} the correlations are determined by a coincidence measurement as is commonly done. It is argued that in order to exclude local hidden variables, coincidence monitors should be avoided.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
