A theoretical comparison of the data augmentation, marginal augmentation and PX-DA algorithms
James P. Hobert, Dobrin Marchev

TL;DR
This paper provides a theoretical comparison of data augmentation, marginal augmentation, and PX-DA algorithms, demonstrating conditions under which these methods outperform each other in MCMC convergence and efficiency.
Contribution
It offers a rigorous theoretical analysis comparing the performance of DA, PX-DA, and marginal augmentation algorithms, especially in group-structured models.
Findings
PX-DA with Haar measure is at least as good as any PX-DA with a proper prior.
Under certain conditions, algorithms driven by R are at least as good as those driven by p.
Theoretical bounds on convergence and performance improvements are established.
Abstract
The data augmentation (DA) algorithm is a widely used Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm that is based on a Markov transition density of the form , where and are conditional densities. The PX-DA and marginal augmentation algorithms of Liu and Wu [J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 94 (1999) 1264--1274] and Meng and van Dyk [Biometrika 86 (1999) 301--320] are alternatives to DA that often converge much faster and are only slightly more computationally demanding. The transition densities of these alternative algorithms can be written in the form , where is a Markov transition function on . We prove that when satisfies certain conditions, the MCMC algorithm driven by is at least as good as that driven by in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
