Timeline analysis and wavelet multiscale analysis of the AKARI All-Sky Survey at 90 micron
Lingyu Wang, Michael Rowan-Robinson, Issei Yamamura, Hiroshi Shibai,, Rich Savage, Seb Oliver, Matthew Thomson, Nurur Rahman, Dave Clements,, Elysandra Figueredo, Tomotsugu Goto, Sunao Hasegawa, Woong-Seob Jeong, Shuji, Matsuura, Thomas G. Muller, Takao Nakagawa

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the detection limits of the AKARI 90 micron survey using timeline and wavelet multiscale methods, identifying real sources and distinguishing them from noise and cirrus emission.
Contribution
It introduces a combined timeline and wavelet multiscale analysis approach to improve point source detection and noise discrimination in the AKARI survey data.
Findings
Point source detection limit of ~0.4 Jy at S/N > 5
IRAS sources above 4σ are confirmed as real sources
Non-IRAS sources are likely noise or cirrus artifacts
Abstract
We present a careful analysis of the point source detection limit of the AKARI All-Sky Survey in the WIDE-S 90 m band near the North Ecliptic Pole (NEP). Timeline Analysis is used to detect IRAS sources and then a conversion factor is derived to transform the peak timeline signal to the interpolated 90 m flux of a source. Combined with a robust noise measurement, the point source flux detection limit at S/N for a single detector row is Jy which corresponds to a point source detection limit of the survey of 0.4 Jy. Wavelet transform offers a multiscale representation of the Time Series Data (TSD). We calculate the continuous wavelet transform of the TSD and then search for significant wavelet coefficients considered as potential source detections. To discriminate real sources from spurious or moving objects, only sources with confirmation are selected.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
