Comment on "Possible resolution of the Casimir force finite temperature correction "controversies""
R. S. Decca, E. Fischbach, B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, D. E.Krause,, D. L\'opez, U. Mohideen, and V. M. Mostepanenko

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent proposed modification to the Lifshitz formula for Casimir forces, demonstrating it conflicts with experimental data and thermodynamic principles, thus challenging its validity.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis showing the proposed modification is inconsistent with experimental results and thermodynamics, refuting its claim to resolve Casimir force controversies.
Findings
The modification contradicts experimental data
It violates the Nernst heat theorem
The proposed resolution is incorrect
Abstract
The recently suggested modification of the transverse electric contribution to the Lifshitz formula (S. K. Lamoreaux, arXiv:0801.1283) is discussed. We show that this modification is inconsistent with the data of two precise experiments, and violates the Nernst heat theorem. The preprint's suggestion concerning the resolution of the "apparent violation of the Third Law of Thermodynamics" is shown to be incorrect.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
