On the Enhancement of Mass Loss in Cepheids Due to Radial Pulsation
Hilding R. Neilson (University of Toronto), John B. Lester (University, of Toronto Mississauga)

TL;DR
This paper develops an analytical model to estimate Cepheid mass-loss rates considering pulsation and shocks, finding rates higher than radiation-driven winds and consistent with observations, which helps explain infrared excesses and mass discrepancies.
Contribution
It introduces a modified analytical method to compute Cepheid mass-loss rates including pulsation effects, advancing understanding of stellar winds in variable stars.
Findings
Mass-loss rates range from 10^{-10} to 10^{-7} M_sun/yr.
Predicted rates align with infrared observations.
Enhanced mass loss explains infrared excess and mass discrepancy.
Abstract
An analytical derivation is presented for computing mass-loss rates of Cepheids by using the method of Castor, Abbott, & Klein (1975) modified to include a term for momentum input from pulsation and shocks generated in the atmosphere. Using this derivation, mass-loss rates of Cepheids are determined as a function of stellar parameters. When applied to a set of known Cepheids, the calculated mass-loss rates range from 10^{-10} to 10^{-7}M_{Sun}/yr, larger than if the winds were driven by radiation alone. Infrared excesses based on the predicted mass-loss rates are compared to observations from optical interferometry and IRAS, and predictions are made for Spitzer observations. The mass-loss rates are consistent with the observations, within the uncertainties of each. The rate of period change of Cepheids is discussed and shown to relate to mass loss, albeit the dependence is very weak.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
