Nature and strength of bonding in a crystal of semiconducting nanotubes: van der Waals density functional calculations and analytical results
Jesper Kleis, Elsebeth Schroder, Per Hyldgaard

TL;DR
This paper uses van der Waals density functional calculations and analytical methods to study the bonding in semiconducting nanotube crystals, revealing vdW interactions consistent with experiments and proposing a framework for modeling nanotube bundling.
Contribution
It introduces a combined ab initio and analytical approach to quantify nanotube bonding, demonstrating the effectiveness of vdW-DF in predicting intertube interactions and separations.
Findings
vdW-DF predicts nanotube intertube bonding strength consistent with experiments.
The wall-to-wall separation matches experimental data.
Nanotube-crystal binding energy can be approximated by pairwise vdW interactions.
Abstract
The dispersive interaction between nanotubes is investigated through ab initio theory calculations and in an analytical approximation. A van der Waals density functional (vdW-DF) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 246401 (2004)] is used to determine and compare the binding of a pair of nanotubes as well as in a nanotube crystal. To analyze the interaction and determine the importance of morphology, we furthermore compare results of our ab initio calculations with a simple analytical result that we obtain for a pair of well-separated nanotubes. In contrast to traditional density functional theory calculations, the vdW-DF study predicts an intertube vdW bonding with a strength that is consistent with recent observations for the interlayer binding in graphitics. It also produce a nanotube wall-to-wall separation which is in very good agreement with experiments. Moreover, we find that the vdW-DF result…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
