Critique of some thermodynamic proofs based on the pump-engine couple
Kamal Bhattacharyya

TL;DR
This paper critically examines thermodynamic proofs based on the pump-engine couple, highlighting their circular reasoning and emphasizing the need for entropic formulation of the second law for rigorous proofs.
Contribution
It identifies circularity in common thermodynamic proofs and discusses ways to avoid or address these issues, advancing the understanding of thermodynamic foundations.
Findings
Common proofs are circular and of doubtful validity
Some proofs can be avoided with alternative approaches
Entropic formulation is essential for rigorous Carnot theorem proofs
Abstract
We argue that all the common thermodynamic proofs based on the pump-engine couple possess an inherent circularity and hence are of doubtful value. In certain cases, ways of avoiding them are suggested. In others, the difficulties are discussed. Particularly, we emphasize that a neat proof of Carnot theorems requires the entropic formulation of the second law.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRocket and propulsion systems research · Heat transfer and supercritical fluids · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
