Constraining The Early-Universe Baryon Density And Expansion Rate
Vimal Simha, Gary Steigman

TL;DR
This paper constrains the early-Universe baryon density and expansion rate by comparing Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, CMB, and LSS data, confirming standard model consistency and highlighting lithium abundance discrepancies.
Contribution
It provides combined constraints on N_nu and eta_10 from multiple cosmological observations, refining early-Universe parameter limits.
Findings
BBN strongly constrains N_nu between 1.6 and 3.3.
CMB/LSS data tightly constrain baryon density, independent of N_nu.
Predicted lithium abundance exceeds observations by a factor of 3 or more.
Abstract
We explore constraints on extensions to the standard models of cosmology and particle physics which modify the early-Universe expansion rate S = H'/H (parametrized by the effective number of neutrinos N_nu). The constraints on N_nu and the baryon density parameter (eta_B = n_B/n_gamma = 10^(-10)*eta_10) from BBN at 20 minutes are compared with those from the CMB at 400 kyr and LSS at 14 Gyr. BBN provides the strongest constraint on N_nu (1.6 < N_nu < 3.3 at 95% confidence), but a weaker constraint on eta_B. The CMB/LSS best constrain the baryon density (5.9 < eta_10 < 6.4 at 95% confidence), independent of N_nu, but provide a relatively weak N_nu constraint, consistent with N_nu = 3. Using the best fit values and the allowed ranges of the CMB/LSS-derived parameters to calculate the BBN-predicted primordial abundances yields excellent agreement with the observationally inferred abundance…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
