The radio luminosity, black hole mass and Eddington ratio for quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Wei-Hao. Bian (IHEP, NJNU), Yan-Mei. Chen (IHEP), Chen. Hu (IHEP),, Kai. Huang (NJNU), and Yan. Xu (NJNU)

TL;DR
This study examines the relationship between black hole mass, radio luminosity, and Eddington ratio in quasars from SDSS, revealing differences between radio-loud and radio-quiet quasars and suggesting additional physical factors influence radio emissions.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of the extit{M}– extsigma* relation in radio-loud and radio-quiet quasars and explores how radio luminosity correlates with black hole properties, highlighting the role of black hole spin.
Findings
Radio-quiet quasars follow the extit{M}– extsigma* relation similar to inactive galaxies.
Radio-loud quasars deviate significantly from the extit{M}– extsigma* relation.
Radio luminosity correlates with black hole mass and Eddington ratio, but other factors like black hole spin are also influential.
Abstract
We investigate the relation for radio-loud quasars with redshift in Data Release 3 of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The sample consists of 3772 quasars with better model of H and \oiii lines and available radio luminosity, including 306 radio-loud quasars, 3466 radio-quiet quasars with measured radio luminosity or upper-limit of radio luminosity (181 radio-quiet quasars with measured radio luminosity). The virial supermassive black hole mass (\mbh) is calculated from the broad \hb line, the host stellar velocity dispersion () is traced by the core \oiii gaseous velocity dispersion, and the radio luminosity and the radio loudness are derived from the FIRST catalog. Our results are follows: (1) For radio-quiet quasars, we confirm that there is no obvious deviation from the relation defined in inactive galaxies when \mbh…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
