Comparing Classes of Finite Structures
Wesley Calvert, Desmond Cummins, Sara Miller, and Julia F. Knight

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new reducibility concept for classes of structures, compares various classes, and establishes their relative complexity, revealing maximal and minimal classes among finite structures.
Contribution
It defines a uniform enumeration reducibility for classes of structures and characterizes their relative complexity, including the maximal and minimal classes.
Findings
Class of cyclic graphs and finite prime fields are equivalent.
Finite graphs and finite linear orders are maximal among finite structures.
Constructed large chains and antichains of classes.
Abstract
We introduce a reducibility on classes of structures, essentially a uniform enumeration reducibility. This reducibility is inspired by the Friedman-Stanley paper on using Borel reductions to compare classes of countable structures. This reducibility is calibrated by comparing several classes of structures. The class of cyclic graphs and the class of finite prime fields are equivalent, and are properly below the class of arbitrary finite graphs. The class of finite graphs and the class of finite linear orders are maximal among all classes of finite structures. We also prove some general characterizations of reducibility to certain classes. Examples of large chains and antichains of classes are constructed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStructural Analysis and Optimization · Optics and Image Analysis · Topology Optimization in Engineering
