A pitfall in the use of extended likelihood for fitting fractions of pure samples in mixed samples
A. Nappi

TL;DR
The paper identifies a subtle analytic mistake in the use of extended likelihood methods for estimating pure sample fractions, which impacts error estimates in widely used software.
Contribution
It reveals a common error in applying extended likelihood to mixed sample analysis and demonstrates its effect on error estimation.
Findings
The mistake affects error estimates in software packages.
Correct application is crucial for accurate fraction determination.
The paper provides guidance to avoid this pitfall.
Abstract
The paper elucidates, with an analytic example, a subtle mistake in the application of the extended likelihood method to the problem of determining the fractions of pure samples in a mixed sample from the shape of the distribution of a random variable. This mistake, which affects two widely used software packages, leads to a misestimate of the errors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
