Aubry sets vs Mather sets in two degrees of freedom
Daniel Massart

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between Aubry and Mather sets for autonomous Tonelli Lagrangians on closed surfaces, showing they almost always coincide when the Mather set contains only periodic orbits.
Contribution
It provides a clarification of the conditions under which Aubry and Mather sets are essentially the same in the context of two-dimensional systems.
Findings
Aubry and Mather sets almost always coincide when Mather set contains only periodic orbits.
The study focuses on autonomous Tonelli Lagrangians on closed surfaces.
The relationship between these sets is clarified in the specific case of non-fixed periodic orbits.
Abstract
We study autonomous Tonelli Lagrangians on closed surfaces. We aim to clarify the relationship between the Aubry set and the Mather set, when the latter consists of periodic orbits which are not fixed points. Our main result says that in that case the Aubry set and the Mather set almost always coincide.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
