The Cultural Evolution of Socially Situated Cognition
Liane Gabora

TL;DR
This paper proposes a non-Darwinian model of cultural evolution, emphasizing the autopoietic transformation of the mind and challenging traditional natural selection explanations for cultural change.
Contribution
It introduces a novel autopoietic framework for understanding cultural evolution, focusing on mind transformation rather than discrete lineage selection.
Findings
Culture evolves through mind actualization, not natural selection.
Ideas and artifacts reflect the current state of the evolved mind.
Cultural change involves interaction and influence among elements, not inheritance of traits.
Abstract
Because human cognition is creative and socially situated, knowledge accumulates, diffuses, and gets applied in new contexts, generating cultural analogs of phenomena observed in population genetics such as adaptation and drift. It is therefore commonly thought that elements of culture evolve through natural selection. However, natural selection was proposed to explain how change accumulates despite lack of inheritance of acquired traits, as occurs with template-mediated replication. It cannot accommodate a process with significant retention of acquired or horizontally (e.g. socially) transmitted traits. Moreover, elements of culture cannot be treated as discrete lineages because they constantly interact and influence one another. It is proposed that what evolves through culture is the mind; ideas and artifacts are merely reflections of its current evolved state. Interacting minds…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
