Dispelling the antihydrogen myth
G. Van Hooydonk

TL;DR
This paper identifies a significant spectral signature at 9.5 eV as evidence for antihydrogen, challenging recent claims and emphasizing the need for critical examination of experimental results.
Contribution
It reveals a large, previously overlooked spectral signature as a definitive indicator of antihydrogen, questioning recent experimental claims.
Findings
The singlet-triplet splitting at 9.5 eV is a key Hbar signature.
The observed HH potential energy curve confirms the spectral signature.
Recent CERN claims about Hbar are premature and require critical review.
Abstract
While achiral Bohr atom theory cannot generate Hbar signatures, achiral Heitler-London bond theory can but its Hbar signatures must be detected. We show that the largest spectral signature to probe Hbar is the singlet-triplet splitting of 9,5 eV at r(0)=0,74 Angstrom, observed in the dihydrogen band spectrum. This large Hbar-signature, overlooked for nearly a century, is confirmed with the observed HH potential energy curve. Hbar claims by CERN-based collaborations, seemingly important for the fate and future of Hbar, are premature and must be examined critically.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHemoglobin structure and function
