The Spectral Lag of GRB060505: A Likely Member of the Long Duration Class
S. McBreen, S. Foley, D. Watson, L. Hanlon, D. Malesani, J. P. U., Fynbo, D. A. Kann, N. Gehrels, S. McGlynn, D. Palmer

TL;DR
This study measures the spectral lag of GRB 060505 and finds it consistent with long-duration gamma-ray bursts, supporting its classification as a long GRB and suggesting some massive stars may die without bright supernovae.
Contribution
The paper provides the first spectral lag measurement of GRB 060505, demonstrating its alignment with long GRBs and challenging the short GRB classification based on spectral lag indicators.
Findings
Spectral lag of GRB 060505 is 0.36+/- 0.05 s.
GRB 060505's properties are consistent with long GRBs.
Supports the idea that some massive stars die without bright supernovae.
Abstract
Two long gamma-ray bursts, GRB 060505 and GRB 060614, occurred in nearby galaxies at redshifts of 0.089 and 0.125 respectively. Due to their proximity and durations, deep follow-up campaigns to search for supernovae (SNe) were initiated. However none were found in either case, to limits more than two orders of magnitude fainter than the prototypical GRB-associated SN, 1998bw. It was suggested that the bursts, in spite of their durations (4 and 102 s), belonged to the population of short GRBs which has been shown to be unrelated to SNe. In the case of GRB 060614 this argument was based on a number of indicators, including the negligible spectral lag, which is consistent with that of short bursts. GRB 060505 has a shorter duration, but no spectral lag was measured. We present the spectral lag measurements of GRB 060505 using Suzakus Wide Area Monitor and the Swift Burst Alert Telescope.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
