An evaluation of the osmotic method of controlling suction
Pierre Delage (ENPC-Cermes), Yu Jun Cui (ENPC-Cermes)

TL;DR
This paper reviews the osmotic technique for controlling suction in unsaturated soil testing, discussing its advantages, drawbacks, and recent developments, and compares it with the axis-translation method.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive evaluation of the osmotic technique, including recent advancements and novel applications in geotechnical testing.
Findings
Osmotic method offers realistic suction conditions and higher suctions.
Advantages include ease of attaining high suctions and relevance to natural conditions.
Drawbacks involve membrane resistance and calibration effects.
Abstract
Experimental techniques of testing the mechanical properties of unsaturated soils are complex and difficult to conduct. As a consequence, complete sets of parameters that characterise the behaviour of unsaturated soils remain scarce and necessary. In this context, it has been found useful to gather the information obtained after some years of practice of the osmotic technique of controlling suction. As compared to the more documented axis-translation technique, the osmotic technique has its own advantages and drawbacks that are discussed in this paper, together with some potential future developments. The osmotic method has been developed by soil scientists in the 1960s and adapted to geotechnical testing in the early 1970s. This paper presents the osmotic technique and comments on its advantages (including suction condition close to reality and higher suctions easily attained) and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
