Comment on "Pygmy dipole response of proton-rich argon nuclei in random-phase approximation and no-core shell model"
N. Paar

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent study on low-energy dipole excitations in proton-rich argon nuclei, emphasizing the need for consistent methodology and validation against experimental data before claiming new exotic excitation modes.
Contribution
It highlights inconsistencies in previous research and stresses the importance of validating theoretical models with experimental data prior to exploring exotic nuclear excitations.
Findings
Identifies inconsistency with previous UCOM-RPA studies.
Questions the resonance-like nature of the low-lying state in $^{32}$Ar.
Emphasizes the need for experimental validation of models.
Abstract
In a recent article by C. Barbieri, E. Caurier, K. Langanke, and G. Mart\'inez-Pinedo \cite{Bar.08}, low-energy dipole excitations were studied in proton-rich Ar with random-phase approximation (RPA) and no-core shell model (NCSM) using correlated realistic nucleon-nucleon interactions obtained by the unitary correlation operator method (UCOM) \cite{Fel.98}. The main objective of this Comment is to argue that the article \cite{Bar.08} contains an inconsistency with respect to previous study of excitations in the same UCOM-RPA framework using identical correlated Argonne V18 interaction \cite{Paa.06}, it does not provide any evidence that the low-lying state declared as pygmy dipole resonance in Ar indeed has the resonance-like structure, and that prior to studying exotic modes of excitation away from the valley of stability one should ensure that the model provides…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
