What to expect from $U(n)$ Seiberg-Witten monopoles for $n > 1$
Raphael Zentner

TL;DR
This paper investigates the generalization of Seiberg-Witten monopole equations to U(n) gauge groups for n > 1, concluding that such extensions likely do not produce new gauge-theoretical invariants due to the emptiness of their moduli spaces under generic conditions.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of U(n) monopole equations, showing that for n > 1, the associated moduli spaces are typically empty, indicating no new invariants arise from these generalizations.
Findings
Moduli spaces are empty for n > 1 under generic deformations.
No non-trivial gauge-theoretical invariants are expected for U(n) monopoles when n > 1.
On Kähler surfaces with b2+ > 1, moduli spaces vanish with non-zero holomorphic 2-form perturbations.
Abstract
We study generalisations to the structure groups U(n) of the familiar (abelian) Seiberg-Witten monopole equations on a four-manifold and their moduli spaces. For one obtains the classical monopole equations. For our results indicate that there should not be any non-trivial gauge-theoretical invariants which are obtained by the scheme `evaluation of cohomology classes on the fundamental cycle of the moduli space'. For, if is positive the moduli space should be `cobordant' to the empty space because we can deform the equations so as the moduli space of the deformed equations is generically empty. Furthermore, on K\"ahler surfaces with , the moduli spaces become empty as soon as we perturb with a non-vanishing holomorphic 2-form.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Geometry and complex manifolds · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
