Optical spectropolarimetry with incomplete data sets
J.R. Maund (1) ((1) University of Texas, Austin)

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether incomplete spectropolarimetric data can be reliably analyzed by assuming equal instrumental corrections for Stokes parameters, using models and real observations to validate the approach.
Contribution
It introduces a method to analyze incomplete dual-beam spectropolarimetry data by assuming eQ=eU, supported by analytical, Monte Carlo models, and observational data.
Findings
eQ-eU is approximately zero, with variance related to S/N ratio
The assumption eQ=eU holds generally true across epochs
Incomplete datasets can be analyzed reliably under this assumption
Abstract
Linear spectropolarimetry is a ``photon-hungry'' observing technique, requiring a specific sequence of observations to determine the Stokes Q and U parameters. For dual-beam spectropolarimeters, the parameters can be ideally determined using observations at N=2 retarder plate positions. The additional polarization signal introduced by instrumental effects requires the redundancy of N=4 observations to correct for these effects. We wish to determine if the ``instrumental signature corrections'', eQ and eU, are identical for observations with dual-beam spectropolarimeters. For instances when observations were acquired at N=3 retarder plate angles, we wish to determine if the complete measurement of one Stokes parameter and the associated instrumental signature correction can be used to determine the other Stokes parameter. We constructed analytical and Monte Carlo models of a general…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
