Estimating the entropy of binary time series: Methodology, some theory and a simulation study

TL;DR

This paper compares popular entropy estimation methods for binary time series, introduces new estimators, proves their consistency, and evaluates their performance through extensive simulations, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.

Contribution

It introduces two new Lempel-Ziv-based entropy estimators with proven consistency and provides a comprehensive comparison of multiple methods including theoretical analysis and simulation results.

Findings

CTW method yields the most accurate estimates

LZ-based estimators perform comparably to plug-in methods

Bias is the main source of error across estimators

Abstract

Partly motivated by entropy-estimation problems in neuroscience, we present a detailed and extensive comparison between some of the most popular and effective entropy estimation methods used in practice: The plug-in method, four different estimators based on the Lempel-Ziv (LZ) family of data compression algorithms, an estimator based on the Context-Tree Weighting (CTW) method, and the renewal entropy estimator. **Methodology. Three new entropy estimators are introduced. For two of the four LZ-based estimators, a bootstrap procedure is described for evaluating their standard error, and a practical rule of thumb is heuristically derived for selecting the values of their parameters. ** Theory. We prove that, unlike their earlier versions, the two new LZ-based estimators are consistent for every finite-valued, stationary and ergodic process. An effective method is derived for the accurate approximation of the entropy rate of a finite-state HMM with known distribution. Heuristic calculations are presented and approximate formulas are derived for evaluating the bias and the standard error of each estimator. ** Simulation. All estimators are applied to a wide range of data generated by numerous different processes with varying degrees of dependence and memory. Some conclusions drawn from these experiments include: (i) For all estimators considered, the main source of error is the bias. (ii) The CTW method is repeatedly and consistently seen to provide the most accurate results. (iii) The performance of the LZ-based estimators is often comparable to that of the plug-in method. (iv) The main drawback of the plug-in method is its computational inefficiency.