The 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO survey: evolution of the clustering of luminous red galaxies since z = 0.6
David A. Wake, Ravi K. Sheth, Robert C. Nichol, Carlton M. Baugh, Joss, Bland-Hawthorn, Russell Cannon, Matthew Colless, Warrick J. Couch, Scott M., Croom, Roberto De Propris, Michael J. Drinkwater, Alastair C. Edge, Jon, Loveday, Tsz Yan Lam, Kevin A. Pimbblet

TL;DR
This study analyzes the evolution of luminous red galaxy clustering from redshift 0.6 to present, finding little change in amplitude but evidence for galaxy mergers influencing their distribution.
Contribution
It provides new observational constraints on the merger rate of luminous red galaxies and tests hierarchical galaxy formation models against clustering data.
Findings
No significant evolution in correlation amplitude with redshift.
A merger rate of approximately 2.4% per Gyr fits the data.
Small-scale clustering constrains halo merger history scatter.
Abstract
We present an analysis of the small-to-intermediate scale clustering of samples of Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs) from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO (2SLAQ) survey carefully matched to have the same rest-frame colours and luminosity. We study the spatial two-point auto-correlation function in both redshift-space and real-space of a combined sample of over 10,000 LRGs, which represent the most massive galaxies in the universe with stellar masses > 10^11 h^-1 M_sun and space densities 10^-4 h^-3 Mpc^-3. We find no significant evolution in the amplitude r_0 of the correlation function with redshift, but do see a slight decrease in the slope with increasing redshift over 0.19 < z < 0.55 and scales of 0.32 < r < 32 h^-1 Mpc. We compare our measurements with the predicted evolution of dark matter clustering and use the halo model to interpret our results. We find…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
