The Lyman-alpha forest at redshifts 0.1 -- 1.6: good agreement between a large hydrodynamic simulation and HST spectra
Pascal Paschos, Tridivesh Jena, David Tytler, David Kirkman and, Michael L. Norman

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that a large hydrodynamic simulation accurately reproduces the statistical properties of the Lyman-alpha forest observed in HST spectra at redshifts 0.1 to 1.6, showing good agreement with empirical data.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison between a high-resolution hydrodynamic simulation and HST observations, confirming the simulation's effectiveness in modeling the intergalactic medium at low redshifts.
Findings
Simulation matches observed flux distribution and mean flux.
Column density and line width distributions are consistent with observations.
Overall, the simulation accurately describes the Lyman-alpha forest at 0.1<z<1.6.
Abstract
We give a comprehensive statistical description of the Lyman-alpha absorption from the intergalactic medium in a hydrodynamic simulation at redshifts 0.1-1.6, the range of redshifts covered by HST spectra of QSOs. We use the ENZO code to make a 76 comoving Mpc cube simulation using 75 kpc cells, for a Hubble constant of 71 km/s/Mpc. The best prior work, by \citet{dave99},used an SPH simulation in a 15.6 Mpc box with an effective resolution of 245 kpc and slightly different cosmological parameters. At redshifts z=2 this simulation is different from data. \citet{tytler07b} found that the simulated spectra at z=2 have too little power on large scales, Lyman-alpha lines are too wide, there is a lack high column density lines, and there is a lack of pixels with low flux. Here we present statistics at z<1.6, including the flux distribution, the mean flux, the effective opacity, and the power…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
