
TL;DR
This paper introduces a projective generalization of expected utility inspired by quantum mechanics, resolving classic decision paradoxes while maintaining simplicity and ensuring equilibrium existence in finite games.
Contribution
It presents a novel decision theory framework that generalizes expected utility using projective methods, addressing longstanding paradoxes in decision theory.
Findings
Resolves classic decision paradoxes
Ensures equilibrium existence in finite games
Retains simplicity and tractability
Abstract
Motivated by several classic decision-theoretic paradoxes, and by analogies with the paradoxes which in physics motivated the development of quantum mechanics, we introduce a projective generalization of expected utility along the lines of the quantum-mechanical generalization of probability theory. The resulting decision theory accommodates the dominant paradoxes, while retaining significant simplicity and tractability. In particular, every finite game within this larger class of preferences still has an equilibrium.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
