Particle acceleration in relativistic collisionless shocks: Fermi process at last?
Anatoly Spitkovsky (Princeton University)

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that relativistic unmagnetized shocks can efficiently accelerate particles through a Fermi-like process, producing a power-law energy tail with significant energetic particles, as shown by long-term PIC simulations.
Contribution
The paper provides the first detailed simulation evidence of particle acceleration in unmagnetized relativistic shocks via a Fermi-like mechanism, characterizing the energy spectrum and acceleration efficiency.
Findings
Downstream particle spectrum includes a relativistic Maxwellian and a high-energy power-law tail.
The power-law tail extends to energies >100 times the thermal peak, with an index of -2.4.
Approximately 1% of particles form the tail, carrying about 10% of the downstream kinetic energy.
Abstract
We present evidence that relativistic shocks propagating in unmagnetized plasmas can self-consistently accelerate particles. We use long-term two-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations to study the well-developed shock structure in unmagnetized pair plasma. The particle spectrum downstream of such a shock consists of two components: a relativistic Maxwellian, with characteristic temperature set by the upstream kinetic energy of the flow, and a high-energy tail, extending to energies >100 times that of the thermal peak. This tail is best fitted as a power law in energy with index -2.4+-0.1, modified by an exponential cutoff. The cutoff moves to higher energies with time of the simulation, leaving a larger power law range. The number of particles in the tail is ~1% of the downstream population, and they carry ~10% of the kinetic energy in the downstream. Upon investigation of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
