The Redshift Evolution of Wet, Dry, and Mixed Galaxy Mergers from Close Galaxy Pairs in the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey
Lihwai Lin (1,2), David R. Patton (3), David C. Koo (2), Kevin, Casteels (3), Christopher J. Conselice (4), S. M. Faber (2), Jennifer Lotz, (5,6), Christopher N. A. Willmer (7), B. C. Hsieh (1), Tzihong Chiueh (8),, Jeffrey A. Newman (9), Gregory S. Novak (2)

TL;DR
This study analyzes how galaxy pair fractions and merger rates evolve with redshift using DEEP2 survey data, revealing different behaviors for red and blue galaxies and quantifying the contribution of wet, dry, and mixed mergers to galaxy growth.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of galaxy merger fractions and rates across redshift, distinguishing between galaxy types and merger types, and estimates their impact on galaxy evolution.
Findings
Pair fraction increases mildly with redshift (m=0.41+-0.20).
At z~1.1, 68% of mergers are wet, 8% dry, 24% mixed.
About 22%-54% of L* galaxies experienced major mergers since z~1.2.
Abstract
We study the redshift evolution of galaxy pair fractions and merger rates for different types of galaxies using kinematic pairs selected from the DEEP2 Redshift Survey. By parameterizing the evolution of the pair fraction as (1+z)^{m}, we find that the companion rate increases mildly with redshift with m = 0.41+-0.20 for all galaxies with -21 < M_B^{e} < -19. Blue galaxies show slightly faster evolution in the blue companion rate with m = 1.27+-0.35 while red galaxies have had fewer red companions in the past as evidenced by the negative slope m = -0.92+-0.59. We find that at low redshift the pair fraction within the red sequence exceeds that of the blue cloud, indicating a higher merger probability among red galaxies compared to that among the blue galaxies. With further assumptions on the merger timescale and the fraction of pairs that will merge, the galaxy major merger rates for 0.1…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research · Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
