Palindromic Saturation
L. Balkov\'a, E. Pelantov\'a

TL;DR
This paper proves that two different definitions of infinite words with the maximum number of palindromes are equivalent, using properties of return words and graph theory, confirming a previous result.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence of two definitions of palindromic saturation in infinite words, providing a new proof of a known result.
Findings
The two definitions of palindromic saturation coincide.
A new proof of the equivalence using return words and graph theory.
Confirmation of the result announced in prior work.
Abstract
We consider two {seemingly} different definitions of infinite words which contain {the} utmost number of palindromes. We show that these two definitions coincide. {The keynote of the proof is a meticulous inspection of properties of complete return words and the application of some basic graph theory.} In fact, we provide another proof of the result announced in \cite{Zamboni}.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · semigroups and automata theory
