Three-dimensional radiative transfer models of clumpy tori in Seyfert galaxies
M. Schartmann (1), K. Meisenheimer (1), M. Camenzind (2), S. Wolf (1),, K. R. W. Tristram (1), Th. Henning (1) ((1) MPIA, Heidelberg, Germany (2), ZAH-LSW Heidelberg, Germany)

TL;DR
This paper presents a new 3D radiative transfer model of clumpy dust tori in Seyfert galaxies, highlighting differences from continuous models and successfully matching recent infrared observations.
Contribution
The study introduces a novel 3D Monte Carlo radiative transfer model for clumpy AGN dust tori, incorporating detailed cloud distributions and comparing results with observations.
Findings
Clumpy models show more temperature scatter than continuous models.
Cloud shadowing affects the 10 micron silicate feature appearance.
Model parameters can reproduce observed mid-infrared interferometric data.
Abstract
Tori of Active Galactic Nuclei are made up of a mixture of hot and cold gas, as well as dust. In order to protect the dust grains from destruction by the hot gas as well as by the energetic radiation of the accretion disk, the dust is often assumed to be distributed in clouds. In our new 3D model of AGN dust tori, the torus is modelled as a wedge-shaped disk in which dusty clouds are randomly distributed, by taking the dust density distribution of the corresponding continuous model into account. We especially concentrate on the differences between clumpy and continuous models in terms of the temperature distributions, the surface brightness distributions and interferometric visibilities, as well as spectral energy distributions. To this end, we employ radiative transfer calculations with the help of the 3D Monte Carlo code MC3D. In a second step, interferometric visibilities are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
