Optical identification of the 3C 58 pulsar wind nebula
Yuri Shibanov (1), Natalia Lundqvist (2), Peter Lundqvist (2), Jesper, Sollerman (2,3), Dmitri Zyuzin (4) ((1) Ioffe Inst., St. Petersburg, Russia,, (2) Stockholm Observatory, Sweden, (3) Dark Cosmology Center, Copenhagen,, Denmark, (4) Acad. Phys. Techn. Univ., St. Petersburg

TL;DR
This study presents the first deep optical imaging detection of the 3C 58 pulsar wind nebula, revealing a faint elliptical object consistent with the pulsar's position and morphology, and compares it across multiple wavelengths.
Contribution
It is the first to identify the optical counterpart of the 3C 58 pulsar wind nebula, confirming its torus-like structure in optical and mid-IR wavelengths.
Findings
Detected optical counterpart consistent with X-ray torus morphology
Optical flux contribution from the pulsar is less than 10%
Multi-wavelength spectrum resembles Crab or B0540-69 pulsar wind nebulae
Abstract
We have performed a deep optical imaging of 3C 58 SNR with the NOT in the B and V bands to detect the optical counterpart of the associated pulsar J0295+6449 and its torus-like wind nebula visible in X-rays. We analyzed our data together with the archival data obtained with the Chandra in X-rays and with the Spitzer in the mid-IR. We detect a faint extended elliptical object with B=24.06 and V=23.11 whose peak brightness and center position are consistent at the sub-arcsecond level with the position of the pulsar. Its morphology and orientation are in excellent agreement with the torus-like pulsar nebula, seen almost edge on in X-rays although its extension is only about a half of that in X-rays. In the optical we likely see only the brightest central part of the torus with the pulsar. The object is identical to the counterpart of the torus recently detected in the mid-IR. The estimated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
